ar (
ar) wrote in
bechdel_test2010-03-29 05:08 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
How To Train Your Dragon
How to Train Your Dragon has two supporting female characters: Astrid, the love interest, and Ruffnut, one of the comic relief characters. Despite the fact that they are both in dragon fighting classes together, I can't recall a single instance in which they ever speak to each other. Astrid speaks almost solely to the hero, Hiccup, and Ruffnut to her male twin brother, Tuffnut. The film is very much a horse-and-his-boy story, substituting "dragon" for "horse;" what dialogue doesn't involve Hiccup in some way isn't very substantial, no matter who's saying it.
That said, I personally found the film enjoyable despite the fact that it fails the Bechdel Test at rule 2, and I hold out hope that if it does well enough to garner sequels, future movies might be Bechdel passes.
That said, I personally found the film enjoyable despite the fact that it fails the Bechdel Test at rule 2, and I hold out hope that if it does well enough to garner sequels, future movies might be Bechdel passes.
no subject
no subject
The biggest one is the fact that Hiccup ends the movie having lost one of his legs in the big final battle; he gets a prosthetic made out of wood and iron. If the film ends up the start of a franchise (the film was clearly written to support sequels if it proves profitable), it'll be a franchise starring a disabled character who goes on adventures and saves the day, which could theoretically be awesome. I like the overall themes of friendship/teamwork and finding creative, non-violent ways to defuse conflict that pervade the film; Hiccup becomes the most talented of his class of dragon fighters not by beating the tar out of them but by using what he's learned about dragons to defend himself against them. He discovers they're scared of eels and brandishes one until they back away, he finds the dragon equivalent of catnip and distracts them, etc. Plus, it's a movie for children that doesn't rely on easy grabs like pop culture references or scatalogical humour; while it makes a few references (to Dungeons and Dragons especially), it doesn't beat them to death, and I am always a fan of movies where I don't have to sit through jokes about bodily functions.
...Also, the dragons remind me so much of kitties that I want to pet them. D:
no subject
I was thinking of taking my [austitic] son, who adores the books, but might get upset by huge deviations in the story.
no subject
no subject
I literally gasped out loud at the reveal of Hiccup's prosthetic leg, because that's something that'd never been done to a lead character in an animated family film, and I seriously just wanted to stand up and applaud at that point. Hiccup is still very much a hero and the loss of the leg isn't treated as something that reduces his worth. Also, it perfectly mirrors Toothless' incomplete tail.
Also, the dragons remind me so much of kitties that I want to pet them.
YES. I kept getting flashbacks to my own cat while watching this. Why doesn't my cat have wings? D:
This film didn't feel like a Dreamworks product at all. I'm still amazed. I looked up the director, turns out he's the guy who directed Lilo & Stitch, which explains a lot.
no subject
Watching it made me want a cat so bad. The market is clearly ripe for a dragonkitty, salfkjhdskjfh. And I didn't know the director was the guy behind Lilo & Stitch! That's brilliant--I can definitely see the resemblance here.
no subject
If I only saw movies that passed the Bechdel Test, I'd see a lot fewer fun movies.
no subject
no subject
no subject
That being said, even if it doesn't pass, it's worth seeing for numerous other awesome reasons (including the spoiler you mentioned, which made me gleeful).
I was also really pleased to see a bunch of kickass, butch female Vikings in the crowd scenes.